Her book examines some of the ways that #Silicon #Valley #billionaires have become effectively complicit in enabling #autocracies to thrive,
agreeing to censorship on their platforms,
following the money.
She has been prominent among those writers shining a light on the ways that
coordinated propaganda strategies in autocracies are fuelling division in the west.
Getting an American president who doesn’t like Nato in office is a lot cheaper than fighting wars
“Of course, I don’t think either Trumpism or the Brexit campaign were foreign ideas,” she says.
“I mean, because I worked at the Spectator in the 1990s I knew many people who were anti-EU then
and who had grassroots deep in the English countryside.
But as we know, what the Russians do, and now others,
they don’t invent political movements – they amplify existing groups.”
In the case of #Trump, she suggests,
“he is clearly somebody who they cultivated for a long time.
Not as a spy or anything.
But they were offering him opportunities,
you know, he was trying to do [property] deals there [in Moscow].
And he’s been anti-Nato since the 80s.
He’s openly scorned American allies all of his life.
In one of his books, he talks about what a mistake it was for the US to be fighting the second world war.
So of course, the Russians would want someone like that,
because their aim is to break up Nato. 
And if they can help get an American president who doesn’t like Nato in office, that’s a huge achievement.
It’s a lot cheaper than fighting wars.”