veganism.social is one of the many independent Mastodon servers you can use to participate in the fediverse.
Veganism Social is a welcoming space on the internet for vegans to connect and engage with the broader decentralized social media community.

Administered by:

Server stats:

297
active users

#webtunnel

0 posts0 participants0 posts today

Over the next few days, we will respond to bridge operators who have enrolled in the WebTunnel campaign to send Tor t-shirts and stickers.

If you have set up your bridges but haven't reached out to us, please email frontdesk@torproject.org using the same email address associated with your bridge contact information.

More info 👇
blog.torproject.org/fighting-c
#tor #webtunnel #censorship

blog.torproject.orgIt takes a (Global) Village to Fight Censorship | Tor ProjectIt's been a year since we launched WebTunnel bridges and the Tor community has successfully scaled WebTunnel bridges from 60 to over 300, surpassing the initial goal of 200 new deployments.
Replied to Kevin Karhan :verified:

Right now the problem with @torproject #BridgeDB is that I can't get #webtunnel bridges on #IPv4 even when I try to specify those by setting ipv6=no at the URL:

bridges.torproject.org/bridges

And no, removing IPv6 from the URL doesn't yield any IPv4 results either.
bridges.torproject.org/bridges

It would be better if #BridgeDB would have a radio button / switch to choose IPv4 & #IPv6 for this reason.

#WhatsMissing: A tool to check if #TorBridges are still available/online/reachable that one can use either #standalone (with #TorBrowser and/or #Tor Expert Bundle) or on @tails_live / @tails / #Tails.

  • Cuz I do run into issues and kinda want to sort #Bridges by availability so I don't waste time on a #TorBridge that is down and also thin-out the list of bridges that ain't online anymore.

Whilst I do acknowledge that @torproject do disrecommend having a huge list of Tor Bridges on hand, I do regularly need them for contacts who are behind a #GreatFirewall and can't #SSH-Tunnel out of it.

Espechally being able to filter for #IPv4only and not just #IPv6only is something I miss, alongside the filter for #PluggableTransports type as @guardianproject #Orbot seems to only handle #obfs4 and not webtunnel or #meek at all...

  • I'm pretty certain that merely pinging a bridge at it's port isn't working as a shure-fire way to check for it's availability.
bridges.torproject.orgThe Tor Project | Privacy & Freedom OnlineDefend yourself against tracking and surveillance. Circumvent censorship.

@ActuallyAubrey That depends on the juristiction in question, the plan & provider in question as well as used hardware in question.

  • In case of even remotely suspected #Stalkerware I do recommend to get personally-owned, controlled, secured and hidden hardware to enable unsurveiled comms.

Consider telephony & SMS inherently & unfixably insecure.

  • If in doubt get a new Android with an anonymous prepaid SIM that has affordable data options and use @torproject / #TorBrowser and #Orbot with #TorBridges on ports 80 & 443 which use #meek & #webtunnel transports, so any surveiling party will only see non-suspicious HTTPS traffic.

OFC a maliciously configured CPE/Router can log & report all pachets that travel through, but #DNS & #HTTP or any unencrypted comms are susceptible.