There has been much ink spilled lately on the topic of what's preventing Mastodon/Fedi's wider adoption.
May I just say... I'm fine with the Fediverse being small. I'm fine with starting out here being an effort and not having been spoonfed 20 follows with my account.
I'm happy influencers don't care about this place.
I'm happy there's no quote tweets.
I think there could be more flexibility in terms of moderation, that's one thing folks have said I agree with.
The bigger Fedi gets the more impossible moderation will get. The filtering technology that exists to automate moderation is tissue paper stretched in front of the firehose of bots and trolls that popularity on the internet brings. Moderation does not scale in any kind of affordable way. Big platforms ALWAYS lose the moderation battle to the sheer number of bad actors and their infinite creativity at end-running technological and biological anti-spam and anti-abuse measures.
Only small communities can be effectively, affordably, moderated. I don't want the Fediverse to scale up. I want lots of small communities effectively policing bad behavior. Not 5-10 gigantic servers that are playing whack-a-mole with fascists. All it takes is one big server that lets the chuds in (which they will, once the community grows too large to effectively moderate) and the entire network might feel the knock-on effects. If my server blocks another, I don't want to lose 1000 good folks just to get rid of 100 white supremacists, ya dig? Keep servers small. Keep moderation aggressive. Don't cater to normies.
That's my little soapbox opinion piece. Like it or lump it. 


#soapbox #fedi