Veganism Social

RetroComputingMXSin embargo, Nokia eventualmente abandonó Symbian en favor de Windows Phone, y la producción de dispositivos con Symbian cesó en 2013 <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/retrocomputingmx" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#retrocomputingmx</a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/Nokia" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#Nokia</a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/symbianOS" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#symbianOS</a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/TechHistory" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#TechHistory</a>

RetroComputingMXNokia adquirió Symbian Ltd., la empresa propietaria de Symbian OS, en junio 24 de 2008. La compra se completó el 2 de diciembre de 2008, después de que Nokia llegara a un acuerdo con los socios de Symbian Ltd. Previamente, Nokia ya era el mayor accionista de la empresa. Tras la adquisición, Nokia creó la Fundación Symbian, una organización sin fines de lucro, para desarrollar y promover una versión de código abierto de Symbian OS. <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/retrocomputingmx" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#retrocomputingmx</a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/Nokia" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#Nokia</a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/symbianOS" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#symbianOS</a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/TechHistory" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#TechHistory</a>

Kevin Karhan :verified:<a href="https://social.vivaldi.net/@ajsadauskas" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">@ajsadauskas</a> <a href="https://infosec.exchange/@JessTheUnstill" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">@JessTheUnstill</a> also <a href="https://infosec.space/tags/BlackBerry" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#BlackBerry</a>'s <a href="https://infosec.space/tags/PlayBook" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#PlayBook</a> <a href="https://infosec.space/tags/Tablet" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#Tablet</a> <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lYmHId9kJP4" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">was released</a> as a accessory screen for their Phones, which gave it "<a href="https://infosec.space/tags/WiiU" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#WiiU</a>-Effect" in terms of marketing.<ul><li>Plus <a href="https://infosec.space/tags/RIM" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#RIM</a> relying hard on business clients and their proprietary applianced mail systems and having big carriers upsell to business people made them look outdated & quite literally out of touch once <a href="https://infosec.space/tags/iPhone" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#iPhone</a> went mainstream.</li></ul>I mean, the hardware was never their problem and <a href="https://infosec.space/tags/SMS" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#SMS</a>-Typists swear by their <a href="https://infosec.space/tags/BlackberryCurve" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#BlackberryCurve</a>'s <a href="https://infosec.space/tags/keyboard" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#keyboard</a> but BlackBerry's <a href="https://infosec.space/tags/toolchain" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#toolchain</a> - just like <a href="https://infosec.space/tags/SymbianOS" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#SymbianOS</a>'s - was just hideous to the point that devs like <a href="https://oxytodon.com/@fuchsiii" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">@fuchsiii</a> didn't even want to try making <a href="https://infosec.space/tags/Apps" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#Apps</a> for those devices.<ul><li>Unlike <a href="https://infosec.space/tags/Mozilla" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#Mozilla</a> fucking up <a href="https://infosec.space/tags/FirefoxOS" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#FirefoxOS</a> by refusing to sell devices to <a href="https://infosec.space/tags/developers" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#developers</a>, by the time RIM & <a href="https://infosec.space/tags/Nokia" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#Nokia</a> came from their high horses, their market shares had been squeezed into mere "rounding errors" by <a href="https://infosec.space/tags/iOS" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#iOS</a> and <a href="https://infosec.space/tags/Android" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#Android</a> as it was way cheaper and easier to get <a href="https://infosec.space/tags/Apps" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#Apps</a> developed, tested, sold, bought and use them than on their devices. </li></ul><a href="https://infosec.space/tags/Sony" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#Sony</a> even released some <a href="https://infosec.space/tags/Symbian" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#Symbian</a> <a href="https://infosec.space/tags/S60" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#S60</a> devices but since they didn't have the same signing keys, one couldn't even <a href="https://infosec.space/tags/sideload" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#sideload</a> apps (not to mention they didn't had the <a href="https://infosec.space/tags/OviStore" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#OviStore</a> on those either!)...

Recent searches

Search options

Administered by:

Server stats:

#symbianos