Some #security / #infosec people really annoy me.
#Marginalized and #vulnerable groups use what is actually available, when they can't use what should be available, but isn't. It isn't available because the majority failed to provide, enforce, or protect it, due to privilege, ignorance, or malevolence.
Pointing to what should be available, and chastising people for clinging to what is actually available, however imperfect that may be, does not make sense. It's like reprimanding those persecuted during the Third Reich for hiding in basements and attics, despite basement window curtains and attic doors being no real impediments for the Gestapo, in your "opinion".
Nobody needs your lecturing on how curtains and doors allegedly "give a false sense of security". Such false sense of security does not exist, people do not feel safe at all, precisely because they are aware of the deficiencies.
Nobody welcomes your sarcasm ridiculing curtains and doors, and your smart-alecky advocacy of having them removed, because they don't "guarantee" protection "anyway". If you have to offer anything that actually guarantees protection, to everybody in need of it: just do so. Until you've made it available, just shut up, and leave the curtains and doors alone.
Also, a historical note on the Third Reich: people in basements did not only hide there. They planned, organized and executed resistance. Armed with weapons, and with culture. They were able to operate under an depressing amount of ambiguity, danger and uncertainty that you couldn't stand for a day.
1. Tolerance. 
